2007 Award Winners
Paper #13
Hibbs Award Nominee for Best Clinical Presentation
Posterior Vertebral Column Resection (VCR) for Severe Pediatric and Adult Spinal Deformity: Indications, Results, and Complications of 43 Consecutive Cases
Lawrence G. Lenke, MD; Brenda A. Sides, MA; Ms. Ms. Linda Koester; Marsha Hensley, RN; Kathy Blanke, RN
Introduction: The ability to treat severe pediatric and adult spinal deformity through an all-posterior vertebral column resection (VCR) approach has obviated the need for a circumferential approach in primary and revision settings. Our purpose was to examine indications, correction rates, and complications of these challenging procedures.
Methods: Between 2002 and 2006, 43 consecutive patients underwent a posterior-only VCR for severe scoliosis (S) (n=7, mean 102˚, range 63˚-150˚); global kyphosis (GK) (n=12, mean 92˚, range 81˚-134˚; angular kyphosis (AK) (n=10, mean 77˚, range 43˚-135˚); or kyphoscoliosis (K+S) (n=14, mean total K+S 198˚, range 149˚-275˚) by a single surgeon. There were 30 pediatric (ave. age 13, range 4-18), and 13 adult (ave. age 52, range 40-74) patients with 23 primary and 20 revision cases. All patients underwent a 1-level (n=24), 2-level (n=15), or 3-level (n=4) VCR utilizing pedicle screws, anteriorly positioned cages (n=31), and intraop spinal cord monitoring (NMEPs & SSEPs). 39 out of 43 (90%) were performed at L1 or cephalad in spinal cord (SC) territory; the remainder were in the upper cauda equina (L2 and/or L3).
Results: The major curve correction was 73˚(72%) for the S cases, 46˚(50%) for the GK cases, 55˚(71%) for the AK cases, and a combined 115˚(58%) for the K+S cases. 7 patients (18%) lost intraoperative NMEP data during correction with data returning to baseline following prompt surgical intervention. All patients following surgery were at their baseline (n=40) or showed improved SC function (n=3), while no one worsened. 2 patients had nerve root palsies postop (unilateral quad deficit in a revision L2 & L3 VCR, unilateral foot drop in a revision T12 & L1 VCR with preop 4/5 strength) resolving spontaneously 6 months/2 weeks respectively. No patient thus far has required revision surgery for any neurologic, wound, instrumentation, or fusion complication.
Conclusion: A posterior-based VCR is a safe but challenging technique to treat severe primary or revision spinal deformities with no spinal cord-related, wound, instrumentation, or fusion complications thus far. Intraoperative SCM (especially motor-evoked potentials) is mandatory to prevent spinal cord-related neurologic complications.








